The inclusion of sanctions against irregular migration would undermine the fundamental concept of trade agreements. The GSP leaves the theme of migration on one page. It does not mention services and therefore has no impact on their provision by individuals; It only grants trade preferences for goods. At present, the European GSP does not contain any other immigration-related provisions or obligations. Some see free trade agreements as an important policy option to reduce unauthorized migration. In the DR-CAFTA debate, for example, some called the agreement a „good immigration policy.“ Supporters argue that trade liberalization will improve the economies of countries that have been riddled with migrants and reduce the „push“ factors that encourage unwanted migration. As employment opportunities for workers in their own countries improve, they say that workers will be less motivated to migrate.53 What should be considered if the EU wishes to expand market access under Mode 4 in order to meet the requirements of partner countries in trade negotiations? First, there are important arguments for addressing Mode 4 in bilateral or regional and non-multilateral contexts within the WTO. Open markets at the WTO level are relatively difficult, as they must apply to all trading partners on the basis of the most favoured nation (although exceptions are possible). The context of free trade agreements is more favourable to the definition of service groups for which access is facilitated in the economic and social interest. In addition, the decrease in the number of games means that the scope is more clearly identifiable. Trends in unauthorized alien migration can be found in crS RS21938, Unauthorized Aliens in the United States: Estimates Since 1986, by [author name scrubbed]. For an analysis of IIRIRA`s impact on unauthorized aliens, see Wayne Cornelius, „Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of U.S.
Immigration Control Policy,“ Population and Development Review, 27, No. 4, Dec. 2001. International trade is generally defined as the purchase and sale of goods and services across international borders. The impact of international trade on migration and vice versa depends on several factors such as the nature of the country of origin, the nature of markets in countries of origin and destination, the nature of immigrants, the size of the immigrant community in the host country, migration policy, bilateral trade agreements and tariffs. This document shows signs of migratory aversion in similar countries of origin economically and culturally. Trade agreements can contribute to long-term development – and thus to combating the root causes of flight and migration – as long as they systematically strive to achieve sustainable development and genuine market opening. The new theory of trade in the 1980s and 1990s broadened neoclassical theory and drew attention to the increase in economies of scale, imperfect markets, externalities and the existence of different technologies in different countries8. Yes, for example, technological differences – not differences in factor elements – are considered the basis of trade, trade and migration, there may be complementary effects.9 A full discussion and analysis of non-immigration visas can be found in the report CRS RL31381, U.S. Immigration Policy on Temporary Admissions, by [author name scrubbed] and [scrubbed]. The latest theoretical and empirical results illustrate the enormous complexity of the relationship between trade and migration.
Other factors (such as war, economic crisis, etc.) often play a more important role than migration triggers than trade policy and trade agreements. In the future, the EU will further integrate migration into its trade policy. This is what the European Commission presents in its `Trade for All` strategy, in which it defines concrete areas of action:69 Mobility provisions must, for example, complement the neg